Decision details

Application for erection of two detached dwellings.

Councillor Ladkin moved that the application be refused for the reasons contained in the officer’s report. In the absence of a seconder, the motion was not put.

Some members felt that the proposed development would not be unsustainable nor would it have an urbanising and adverse impact on the visual appearance and rural character of the countryside. It was moved by Councillor Boothby and seconded by Councillor Roberts that the application be approved for these reasons. Upon being put to the vote, the motion was LOST.

It was moved by Councillor Ladkin and seconded by Councillor Hodgkins that the application be refused for the reasons contained in the officer’s report. Upon being put to the vote, the motion was CARRIED and it was

RESOLVED – permission be refused for the reasons contained in the officer’s report.