Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Application for creation of an agricultural access.
In introducing the report, it was highlighted that paragraphs 1.2 and 10.2 which referred to the terms of the S106 agreement being delegated to the Head of Planning and Development should not refer to a S106 agreement but should read that the final details of the planning conditions be delegated to the Head of Planning and Development.
It was moved by Councillor Boothby that the application be refused on grounds of highway and public safety. In the absence of a seconder, the motion was not put.
It was moved by Councillor Sutton, seconded by Councillor Taylor and
RESOLVED – permission be granted subject to the conditions contained in the officer’s report, with the final detail of the conditions delegated to the Head of Planning and Development.
Report author: Tom White
Publication date: 29/06/2017
Date of decision: 20/06/2017
Decided at meeting: 20/06/2017 - Planning Committee
Accompanying Documents: