Issue - meetings

19/00464/OUT - Factory Units, 23 Wood Street, Hinckley

Meeting: 02/03/2021 - Planning Committee (Item 656)

656 19/00464/OUT - Factory Units, 23 Wood Street, Hinckley pdf icon PDF 348 KB

Application for residential development of existing industrial site (outline – access, layout and scale only).

 

Late items received after preparation of main agenda:

 

Introduction:-

 

Following the publication of the committee report, an amended Concept Drawing has been received (Drg No: 19/28 07A).

 

Appraisal:-

 

Following the amendments made to the Concept Layout Plan which revise the siting of Block A, the Concept Drawing was not amended. The amendments made in the Concept Drawing now reflect the alterations made to the layout of the proposal. The Concept Drawing also includes details of the boundary wall and railings alongside Wood Street and so to the front of Block A.

 

Recommendation:-

 

The recommendation contained in the Committee Report remains unaltered. However, Condition 3 should be amended to read:

 

3.         The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in complete accordance with the submitted application details as follows:

 

a)    Site Location Plan Drg No:  19/28; Block Plan Drg No: 19/28 02 and Street Elevation Drg No: 19/28 06A received by the local planning authority on 14 June 2020

b)    Concept Site Layout Drg No: 19/28 05E received by the local planning authority on 21 January 2021

c)    Concept Drawing Drg No: 19/28 07A received by the local planning authority on 25 February 2021

 

Reason: To ensure a satisfactory form of development in accordance with Policies DM1, DM10, DM11 and DM12 of the SADMP (2016).

Minutes:

Application for residential development of existing industrial site (outline – access, layout and scale only).

 

Notwithstanding the officer’s recommendation that permission be granted, members felt that the development would be detrimental to residential amenity due to overlooking and was contrary to DM10. It was moved by Councillor Bray, seconded by Councillor W Crooks and

 

RESOLVED – permission be refused for the following reason:

 

The development, due to proximity of block A in relation to the existing residents opposite, would result in an unacceptable level of overlooking which is contrary to policy DM10 of the Site Allocations and Development Management Plan DPD and the Good Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document.


Meeting: 08/12/2020 - Planning Committee (Item 576)

576 19/00464/OUT - Factory Units, 23 Wood Street, Hinckley pdf icon PDF 505 KB

Application for residential development of existing industrial site (Outline - access, layout and scale only).

 

Late items received after preparation of the agenda:

 

Introduction:-

Following the publication of the committee report, concern has been raised by local residents that with the loss of the car parking provision on the site and the potential for additional car parking from future residents there is a need for parking permits to be introduced in the area.

 

Concern has also been raised whether each proposed unit would have adequate natural daylight into the habitable rooms.

 

It has been noted that the committee report contains an error in the figure for the off-site commuted sum for affordable housing.

 

Appraisal:-

Residential amenity of future residents

Condition 4 seeks to impose a maximum number of residential units on the site. An assessment will need to be made at the reserved matters stage to ensure that this number of units can be accommodated on the site and that provision can be made for each unit to have adequate useable floor space and natural daylight to all habitable rooms. Based on this assessment at reserved matters stage, a lower number of residential units may only be achievable on the site. A planning condition should be imposed to ensure that detailed floor plans and window details are submitted with the reserved matters for appearance.

 

Parking Provision

As discussed at paragraph 8.54 in the committee report, there are on-street parking restrictions during the daytime along the roads in the vicinity of the site. Whilst the site layout submitted with the outline application demonstrates that car parking provision could be achieved for 37 car parking spaces, condition 19 is recommended to be amended to allow an assessment of whether additional car parking provision can be provided within the site on areas shown for soft landscaping and to ensure appropriate parking is provided for the provision of housing to be accommodated on site.

Discussions have also been undertaken with the parking team responsible for the Council’s car parks who has confirmed that parking permits for existing residents could be made available which would allow them to park in the daytime at the Alma Street and Druids Street Car Parks.  There are no restrictions in the evening and overnight after 6pm to 8am on the surrounding streets.

 

Section 106 Agreement

The off-site commuted sum for affordable housing should read £48,708.00 instead of £72,113.00.

 

Recommendation:-

The recommendation contained in the Committee Report should be amended to read as follows:

·                The completion within 3 months of this resolution a S106 agreement to secure the following obligations:

·                     £48,708.00 as an off-site commuted sum for affordable housing.

·                     £1585.00 towards civic amenity facilities at Barwell.

·                     £970 towards library facilities at Hinckley Library.

·                     £19,400.40 towards the cost of providing additional health care accommodation for 85 patients in Hinckley.

·                     Off-site open space contribution towards the public open space at Hollycroft Park, Argents Mead and/or Queens Park of £37,697.10 and £20,017.20 for maintenance costs.

·                     Planning conditions outlined at the end of  ...  view the full agenda text for item 576

Minutes:

Application for residential development of existing industrial site (outline – access, layout and scale only).

 

Notwithstanding the officer recommendation that permission be granted, some members felt that the issues raised about overlooking required more investigation and the positioning of block A should be reconsidered. It was moved by Councillor Bray and seconded by Councillor Hollick that the application be deferred for up to two months to look into these matters. Upon being put to the vote, the motion was CARRIED and it was

 

RESOLVED – the application be deferred for up to two months to discuss the abovementioned concerns with the applicant.