Agenda and draft minutes

Apologies for absence were submitted on behalf of Councillors Moore, Mullaney and Smith, with the following substitutions authorised in accordance with council procedure rule 10:

Councillor Bools for Councillor Moore

Councillor Williams for Councillor Mullaney.

To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 15 July 2025.

It was moved by Councillor Bray, seconded by Councillor Flemming and

RESOLVED – the minutes of the meeting held on 15 July be confirmed as a correct record.

Councillor C Gibbens stated that she was working as a consultant with DEFRA and Natural England, but confirmed that her work did not relate to planning matters nor any items on the agenda.

To report progress on any decisions delegated at the previous meeting.

The Planning Manager provided an update on decisions delegated at the previous meeting.

Outline planning application for the erection of up to 415 dwellings including landscaping, open space, drainage and associated infrastructure (outline – access only).

Late items received after preparation of agenda:

Additional comments received in objection:

We have now received 7 further objections against this application. The additional comments largely raise points already summarised in the committee report but several make specific reference to the location of the proposed access / roundabout. The comments note the impacts that its location has on residents of Hardy Close and the possibility of moving the access to include existing access points from the Admirals housing estate (Nelson Drive or Drake Way). It is suggested that such an access would offer a betterment to residents who currently struggle to exit onto the A47 via these junctions. Alternatively, it is suggested that if the roundabout cannot be moved in this way, it could be moved further north into the application site to avoid impacts on residents of the Admirals estate. The applicant has confirmed that they do not own all of the land required to deliver a roundabout at either Nelson Drive or Drake Way and that their design is the best option in terms of balancing other considerations such impacts on the segregated pedestrian / cycle route south of Normandy Way. Officers note that the Normandy Way junction is subject to heighted surface water risks, is the location of the proposed surface water drainage areas and such a change would negatively impact the ecology associated with the brook in that area. Finally, the Council is required to consider the access as proposed by the applicant, and the Local Highway Authority have not required these suggested amendments as they consider the proposals are safe.

Highways update:

National Highways have confirmed that they still require further modelling and trip generation information but that such information is ‘relatively minor’ and required to demonstrate how the impact on the A5 has been addressed. The applicant responded with further information yesterday and will continue to work with this consultee. Given National Highways’ current recommendation is deferral, Officer’s recommendation for this application is subject to an additional requirement as stated below.

Additional recommendation:

·         That planning permission is also granted subject to confirmation from National Highways that they recommend conditional approval.

Outline application for the erection of up to 415 dwellings including landscaping, open space, drainage and associated infrastructure (outline – access only)

Two objectors, the agent and a ward councillor spoke on this application.

Concern was expressed about the proximity of the proposed properties to existing gardens, noise impact and the impact on the junction of the A47 with Ashby Road. It was moved by Councillor S Gibbens, seconded by Councillor Cope, proposed the item be deferred to allow for more consideration and information in relation to the concerns raised. Upon being put to the vote, the motion was CARRIED and it was

RESOLVED – the application be deferred.

Application for approval of reserved matters (relating to appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for the erection of 120 dwellings and associated works) attached to planning permission 22/01227/OUT (APP/K2420/W/23/3320601) including discharge of conditions 5 (ecological constraints and opportunities), 6 (biodiversity details), 9 (surface water scheme) and 11 (site/ground investigation).

Late items received after preparation of agenda:

Information submitted by the applicant to members of the committee:

On 5 August members of the committee received additional information from the applicant with regards to the future management and maintenance of the roads and footways within the development as well as a general factsheet on the application.

Update on report and recommendation:

Paragraph 8.53 (page 56) of the officer’s report incorrectly states that condition 11 will be partially discharged. To clarify, as per the recommendations at 1.1 (page 43) and 10.1 (page 56), condition 11 can be fully discharged.

Reserved matters application (relating to appearance, landscaping, layout and scale for the erection of 120 dwellings and associated works) attached to planning permission 22/01227/OUT (APP/K2420/W/23/3320601) including discharge of condition 5 (ecological constraints and opportunities), 6 (biodiversity details), 9 (surface water scheme) and 11 (site/ground investigation).

The agent spoke on this application.

Members expressed concern about the layout of the site and proximity to existing properties and the lack of registered provider engaged on the development. It was moved by Councillor Webber-Jones and seconded by Councillor Bools that the item be deferred for further discussion on the aforementioned matters. Upon being put to the vote, the motion was CARRIED and it was

RESOLVED – the application be deferred.

Application for demolition of the existing commercial workshop, removal of existing containers and erection of a replacement commercial workshop.

Late items received after publication of agenda:

Following the publication of the report the below additional condition recommended should the application be approved:

‘Notwithstanding the submitted details, prior to any above ground construction, full details of the proposed western boundary treatment (including the proposed materials) shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The boundary treatment shall be completed in full accordance with the approved details prior to the first use of the development hereby approved and maintained while the B8 and B2 use is operational.

Reason: To ensure that the development has a satisfactory external appearance in accordance with Policy DM10 of the adopted Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Development Plan Document (2016).’

Application for demolition of the existing commercial workshop, removal of existing containers and erection of a replacement commercial workshop.

An objector, the agent, applicant and ward councillor spoke on this application.

It was moved by Councillor Bray and seconded by Councillor Cook that permission be granted subject to the conditions outlined in the officer’s report and late items, and subject to officers reviewing the proposed materials and their impact on the character and appearance of the area. Upon being put to the vote, the motion was CARRIED and it was

RESOLVED –

(i)            Planning permission be granted subject to:

a.    The conditions outlined in the officer’s report and late items;

b.    Officers reviewing the proposed materials and their impact on the character and appearance of the area;

(ii)          The Head of Planning be granted powers to determine the final detail of planning conditions.

The meeting adjourned at 7.40pm and reconvened at 7.45pm.

Application for change of use from existing residential dwelling to residential care home (class C2) for up to three people and conversion of existing garage to office space.

Application for change of use from existing residential dwelling to residential care home (class C2) for up to three people and conversion of existing garage to office space.

A ward councillor spoke on this application.

It was moved by Councillor Bray, seconded by Councillor Lynch and

RESOLVED –

(i)            Permission be granted subject to the conditions contained in the officer’s report;

(ii)          The Head of Planning be granted authority to determine the final detail of planning conditions.

Application for change of use of land and siting of nine single storey  holiday lodges with vehicle parking and associated works (revised scheme 23/00508/FUL).

Application for change of use of land and siting of nine single storey holiday lodges with vehicle parking and associated works (revised scheme 23/00508/FUL).

The applicant spoke on this item.

It was moved by Councillor Bray, seconded by Councillor R Allen and

RESOLVED –

(i)            Permission be granted subject to the conditions outlined in the officer’s report;

(ii)          The Head of Planning be granted authority to determine the final detail of the planning conditions.

Outline application for up to 126 dwellings (all matters except access).

Late items received after publication of agenda:

Amendments to Planning Conditions

1.               All the planning conditions were agreed to by the Applicant on 11 August 2025.

2.               The Parameters Plan was removed from Condition 03 (Approved Plans) and included in a new planning condition (Condition 28) that is detailed as follows:

“28        The details of the layout of the development within any forthcoming Reserved Matters application shall have regard for the indicative layout detailed within the Parameter Plan (005-01C) (02-1644) (submitted: 12.05.2025) and any application that departs from this layout shall be accompanied by appropriate justification within a Design and Access Statement.

Reason: To ensure a satisfactory form of development in accordance with Policies DM1, DM4, and DM10 of the adopted Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Development Plan Document (2016).”

3.               Planning Condition 05 (Land Contamination) was amended to remove the reference of ‘around the existing electricity substation’ at the request of the Applicant.

4.               Planning Conditions 08 (Noise Protection of Proposed Dwellings), 09 (Infiltration Testing), and 10 (Surface Water Drainage Scheme) have been amended to secure these details at any forthcoming Reserved Matters application rather than prior to the commencement of development.

5.               Planning Condition 15 (Electronic Communications) has been removed from the planning application because The Building Regulations 2010 (as amended) secures the provision of gigabit broadband infrastructure and connectivity within the construction of all new homes in England.

6.               Planning Condition 21 (Tree Protection Works) was amended to secure details that protect the existing trees within the site within any forthcoming Reserved Matters application. As a result, Tree Protection Plan V3 (8306) was removed from Condition 03 (Approved Plans).

7.               Planning Condition 22 (Public Open Space) was amended to state the following:

“22.    Any forthcoming Reserved Matters application shall include details of the

precise boundaries and quantities of the public open space typologies across the site in accordance with the requirements detailed in Policy 19 of the adopted Core Strategy (2009).”

8.               Planning Condition 26 (External Lighting) has been removed from the planning application because this condition duplicates Planning Condition 18 (External Lighting).

Responses from Members of the Public

9.               Since the creation of the Committee Report, one further objection has been received to the planning application on the following grounds:

·                The Committee Report does not reference planning permission 02/00685/COU, which was for the creation of a golf course and ancillary facilities including a clubhouse. This planning permission included a Section 106 Agreement and a Section 278 Agreement for a ghost island right turn lane onto Station Road. The current proposal conflicts with the legal agreements within this previous planning permission

·                The planning application 24/00769/FUL for nine single storey holiday lodges, which is referred to in Paragraph 3.7 of the Committee Report has not been determined by the Council at this stage, and is to be determined by the Planning Committee on Tuesday 12 August 2025

·                The development fails to have proper regard for impact  ...  view the full agenda text for item 122.

Outline application for up to 126 dwellings (all matters reserved except access).

Two objectors, the agent, and a representative of the parish council spoke on this application.

Notwithstanding the officer’s recommendation that permission be granted, members expressed concern about the visual impact due to lack of landscaping, the proposed development being contrary to the Market Bosworth Neighbourhood Development Plan, the proximity to the Battlefield Line, drainage, highway safety. It was moved by Councillor Bray and seconded by Councillor Cook that permission be refused, with the wording of the reasons for refusal delegated to the Planning Manager in consultation with the chair of the Planning Committee and the mover and seconder of the motion. Upon being put to the vote, the motion was CARRIED and it was

RESOLVED –

(i)            Planning permission be refused;

(ii)          Wording of the reasons for refusal be delegated to the Planning Manager in consultation with the chair of the Planning Committee and Councillors Bray and Cook as mover and seconder of the  motion.

To report on progress relating to various appeals.

Members were updated on progress in relation to appeals. Officers were thanked for their work.